OpenAI Unanimously Rejects Elon Musk's $97 Billion Buyout Offer
OpenAI's board has unanimously rejected Elon Musk's $97.4 billion buyout offer, viewing it as a competitive disruption tactic. The board reaffirmed OpenAI's commitment to its nonprofit mission, amidst ongoing debates about its potential shift to a traditional for-profit structure. Musk's legal maneuvering reflects the tensions surrounding AI governance.

In a significant development in the artificial intelligence sector, the board of directors at OpenAI has unanimously rejected Elon Musk's unsolicited buyout offer valued at $97.4 billion. This decision, announced via X (formerly Twitter), marks a new chapter in the strained relationship between the entrepreneur and the organization he co-founded.
Brett Taylor, chair of OpenAI's board, described Musk's acquisition attempt as a mere maneuver aimed at disrupting competition. In an official statement, he firmly asserted that "OpenAI is not for sale" and reaffirmed the organization's commitment to its primary mission: developing beneficial artificial general intelligence for all of humanity.
Musk's substantial offer included his company xAI and a group of investors. The proposal was swiftly dismissed informally by Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI, before being officially rejected by the board. Andy Nussbaum, an advisor representing the board, emphasized that the offer did not specify the precise valuation of OpenAI's nonprofit foundation.
This refusal occurs against a broader backdrop of transformation for OpenAI. Originally established as a nonprofit organization, it evolved into a hybrid model in 2019, incorporating a capped-profit entity. Currently, the organization is contemplating a transition to a traditional for-profit structure, a move that Musk is actively seeking to block through legal means.
In an interesting twist, Musk's lawyers indicated that their client would withdraw his offer if the board committed to maintaining OpenAI's nonprofit mission and abandoned plans to transform into a commercial enterprise. This position contrasts with Musk's previous legal arguments, a contradiction highlighted by OpenAI's attorneys in recent court communications.
This situation underscores the growing tensions between differing visions for artificial intelligence development and the significant stakes involved in governance and future direction for major tech companies.